New Research on Vocabulary and Learning
View the full report: Building Academic Vocabulary Report
Welcome! A blog, run by Jennifer Abell, Vice Chair of the Charles County Board of Education, involving topics and issues on education and children. Comments are not official communications of the Charles County School Board but are a personal effort to be more transparent. Both complimentary comments and constructive criticism are not only appreciated but encouraged. Student participation is also encouraged and therefore the use of proper language and decorum is requested at all times.
Posted by Jennifer Abell at 7:44 AM
Labels Curriculum, National Education News
MY PLEDGE TO YOU
"I will serve as an educational advocate on behalf of our community in order to advance the educational vision for our schools, pursue its goals, and encourage progress as we work together in a diverse society."
2 comments:
And taxpayers needed a study to determine that a methodical approach to vocabulary is better than the [non-existent] approach we have today?! What will we waste our money on next? A study to tell us nit wits that students benefit from using dictionaries?
English is required all 12 years. Students should have challenging weekly spelling lists and separate vocabulary lists each and every week from 1st grade all the way through high school.
Trash in, trash out. A gilded tongue requires effort from students and direction from educators. Instruction in vocabulary should be a staple in every classroom of any system worth it's salt. (Especially when they're charging taxpayers $9,000+ per pupil per year.) If we expect our children to utillize literature where the only interjections are profane words, and ghetto speech patterns are the norm, then we shouldn't be surprised when our graduates don't understand, let alone incorporate, multisyllabic words. Nor should we be surprised when hoards of them flunk the English HSA.
I agree with you, Margaret. But did you look at this study? I was not impressed with its design or presentation. Also, I thought it curious that “The constructed-response items for the pre-test and the post-test were scored by a consultant hired by M&A. Because the consultant was proficient in both English and Spanish, scoring responses in both languages was possible.”
Hmmm…the premise of BAV and this study, that “teaching standards-based academic terminology using a specific six-step process can enhance students’ abilities to read and understand subject-area content and ultimately help students build a store of academic background knowledge that enhances academic achievement” is gobbledy-speak that translates to what in plain English?
Post a Comment