Notes from the Parent Advisory Council, 10/28/14
(Thank you to Joseph Cormier Arthur Middleton Owls PTO President for forwarding the notes)
Welcome! A blog, run by Jennifer Abell, Vice Chair of the Charles County Board of Education, involving topics and issues on education and children. Comments are not official communications of the Charles County School Board but are a personal effort to be more transparent. Both complimentary comments and constructive criticism are not only appreciated but encouraged. Student participation is also encouraged and therefore the use of proper language and decorum is requested at all times.
(Thank you to Joseph Cormier Arthur Middleton Owls PTO President for forwarding the notes)
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
6:34 AM
0
comments
The Washington Post
October 2, 2014
By Ovetta Wiggins
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
10:42 AM
0
comments
Labels Curriculum, MD Education News
The below notes are my personal notes and are not intended to be all-inclusive or official minutes for the Board of Education meetings and are provided as a request from my supporters and the general public in a personal effort to be more transparent. Although I have diligently tried to make these notes as unbiased and accurate as possible, I am only human and do make mistakes.
Access CSM
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
6:57 AM
0
comments
Labels Curriculum, Meetings; Agendas; Notes
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
8:55 AM
0
comments
Labels Meetings; Agendas; Notes
Huffington Post
By: Peter Greene
10/17/14
We have always paid public servants a flat fee, untethered to any sort of "performance measures." That's because we want public service to be completely disconnected from any private interests.
Fighting Fire With Money
Imagine if, for instance, we paid fire fighters on sliding scale, based on how many of which type fires they put out at a certain speed. This would be disastrous for many reasons.
Fire fighters would refuse to work in cities where there were few fires to fight, because they couldn't make a living. In cities where there were commonly multiple fires and their livelihood on the line, fire fighters would be encouraged to look at each fire call through a lens of "What's in it for me?"
For instance, in a system where fire fighters were paid based on the value of the flame-besieged property, fire fighters might view some small building fires as Not Worth the Trouble. Why bother traveling to the other side of the tracks? It's only a hundred-dollar blaze, anyway. Let's wait till something breaks out up in the million-dollar neighborhood.
In the worst-case scenario, one of our fire fighters depending on performance-based pay to feed his family may be tempted to grab some matches and go fire up some business.
Perverse Incentivization
Occasionally we've seen these kinds of perverse incentives in action, and we don't much like it. The areas of the country where you take extra speed limit care at the end of the month because the local police have a quota to meet. The neighborhood where cops have to roust a certain number of suspects a week to keep their job ratings. Nobody thinks these are examples of excellence in public service.
In fact, we have tried private police forces and private fire companies in the past. We don't much care for how that works out, because it creates a system that provides excellent service -- but only for the customers who are paying for it.
The idea of public service is to create a class of people who are above self-interest and who do not respond to a single boss. We are outraged when abuse of police power happens precisely because we expect the police to act as if they work for everyone, and to put their dedication to that service above any single interests, including their own.
That's the definition of public service -- service roles that are stripped of any possibility of incentives other than the mandate to serve the public good. That's what we mean by "professional" -- a person who puts all personal self-interest aside and focuses on Getting the Job Done. Trying to motivate a public servant with self-interest inevitably tends to pollute the professional setting with the very self-interest that we're trying to get out of there.
Read more HERE
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
7:15 AM
0
comments
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
7:05 AM
0
comments
Labels Budget/Finance, MD Education News
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
8:10 AM
0
comments
Labels National Education News, Testing
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
8:00 AM
0
comments
Labels MD Education News, New Schools; Redistricting, Overcrowding Issues
The Board of Education Meeting on Tuesday, October 14 will be re-broadcast on Comcast Channel 96, Verizon FIOS Channel 12 and is available via webstream at http://www.ccboe.com/ . To view the full agenda and the various reports, please visit BoardDocs.
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
6:11 PM
0
comments
Labels Meetings; Agendas; Notes
Ever since I was first appointed to the Charles County Board of Education in 2004, I have repeatedly advocated for developer built schools. WHile I have heard arguements ranging from "it can't be done" to "we don't have a big enough developer in this county" there are counter-arguements to ALL of them. Yes, it can be done! No it's not against the law! Yes, we the school system still have control over design and programs! And if we don't have a developer big enough in the county (which i find hard to believe), what about a consortium of developers. Come on people, think outside the box and let's work together. See the article below. Yes, it's just a stadium and it is on the other side of the country....but can we at least SERIOUSLY, look into this now?
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
7:53 AM
0
comments
(This is a blog post published by a teacher, interesting.)
Huffington Post
October 8, 2014
By Nicole J. Di Donato
Little heads bent over white-lined paper, pencils scratching out a story barely keeping up with the imaginative ideas swirling. I survey my third graders while they write -- their passion for what they have to say, and the diligence with which they tackle saying it is heart-warming. A few years ago, I wouldn't have asked my students to write a fictional story, narrative writing being difficult for young learners to handle with all of its many attributes. But along came the Common Core, and when it did, I was forced to rethink my stance, and find ways to begin teaching this style of writing. That was just the beginning of my journey with the new standards.
I am a teacher, and I support the Common Core State Standards. These days it feels like I need to keep this to myself. The Common Core seems like everyone's favorite initiative to hate, but exactly who are the critics? Politicians running in mid-term elections? Celebrities like Louis C.K.?
In the last few years, my colleagues and I have been stepping up the rigor and content of our instruction in response to the standards' implementation. Dare I say we have actually enjoyed this work? I must admit that Massachusetts' educators were lucky. Our former learning standards were comprehensive to begin with. For us, adopting the Common Core has been more of a shift than a radical change, but a shift I am more than happy to make if it leads to equal educational opportunities for students in all parts of the United States.
The Common Core is a list of vertically-aligned learning standards from grades K through 12. The skills build year to year, allowing students the opportunity to go deeper in their understanding of each standard as they mature as learners. This type of intentional, developmentally-appropriate plan for instruction is not easy to create, but yet, here it is, arguably one of the most sweeping education reforms in our country's history.
Where there are learning standards, there needs to be an assessment for measuring how schools are doing in their teaching. Of course an assessment tool needed to be developed to go with the Common Core. Massachusetts has chosen PARCC. It is computerized, although a paper/pencil version exists, and has been designed to match the rigor of the Common Core. Having seen samples of PARCC questions, it is definitely not a typical fill-in-the-bubble test, but one that will ask students to think critically about the information they are given.
Read more HERE.
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
6:14 AM
9
comments
Labels Curriculum, National Education News
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
2:51 PM
0
comments
Labels Communication, Technology
(Not sure of my opinion on this one, I can see both sides. Maybe a less "in your face" approach, or different name. I would love to hear your feedback.)
ETSU Student Government Votes Against Funding 'Sex Week' Fearing Conservative Backlash
Huffington Post
Tyler Kingkade
October 8, 2014
The student government at East Tennessee State University voted Tuesday against providing funding for a student group that wanted to organize a "Sex Week" event on campus, with student leaders going so far as to call the proposed events "dangerous" because of potential backlash from conservative lawmakers.
With 23 students in favor and one opposing, the ETSU student government overwhelmingly voted against providing the nearly $10,000 in student fee funding requested by the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance, a pro-abortion rights student group, to cover costs for a Sex Week on campus in February. Student senators told The Huffington Post that they were worried the sex education events for adult students would prove too risqué.
"When they started organizing this at ETSU, we were very concerned about it," Brandon Johnson, a junior and student senator at the university, said. "We are all for sexual education -- we made a very proud stance on that, everyone should be informed about it. Unfortunately, the 'Sex Week' banner has such a negative name associated with that."
Read more HERE
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
6:11 AM
0
comments
Labels National Education News
The Washington Post
By Donna St. George
October 8, 2014
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
5:57 AM
0
comments
Labels Curriculum, MD Education News, Testing
[Note: This article was published a year ago.]
Eleanor Yang Su
October 3, 2013
CIROnline
Almost everything about a school cafeteria meal has a regulation. The
federal government caps the amount of fat and salt in breakfasts and
lunches. It sets minimum standards for servings of fruit, vegetables,
grains, milk and meat.
But one widely used and often-overused product has no official limits: sugar.
As Congress faces increased scrutiny over subsidies to the sugar
industry, nutritionists and anti-obesity crusaders are focusing on the
amount of sugar in school meals – and asking whether regulations
governing school lunches deliberately exclude limits on sugar to favor a
powerful industry.
“Certainly, the food industry has pushed back against having a sugar
standard,” said Margo Wootan, director of nutrition policy at the Center
for Science in the Public Interest, which has been pushing for a limit
on added sugars for years. “If the USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture)
is going to address other key parts of the dietary guidelines – fats,
salts and calories – why choose to leave one dietary guideline out?”
Recent research shows that sugar levels in school meals are more than
double what is recommended for the general public. Elementary school
lunch menus contain 115 percent of the recommended daily calories from
added sugars and fats, according to a November study
by the USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service. Middle school and high school
lunch menus also are sugar- and fat-heavy, averaging between 59 and 74
percent of the recommended amounts.
About 1 in 5 school lunch menus includes dessert, the federal study
said. The most common are cookies, cakes and brownies, some of which are
counted as grain requirements. Other popular options are fruit with
gelatin, ice cream and pudding.
The data from the School Nutrition Dietary Assessment is based on a
2010 survey of about 900 schools across the country and is considered
the most comprehensive federal research on school meals.
For years, schools added sweets, such as graham crackers or cookies,
to bump up calorie counts and meet minimum thresholds. Researchers say
that practice is less common now that the USDA has implemented calorie
limits. But some say sugary treats still are appealing to school
administrators.
“Sugar-related products are the least expensive source of calories in
the school meal program,” said Matthew Sharp, senior advocate for
California Food Policy Advocates. He said many school officials oppose
reducing sugar in meals because it would force them to buy more
expensive products.
The report did not break out sugars specifically. It also didn’t
count sugars that occur naturally in fruit and milk, but rather
sweeteners added to processed or prepared foods...
...“Sugar is the only nutrient with no dietary reference intake, and it’s
because the food industry doesn’t want it,” said Dr. Robert Lustig, a
pediatric endocrinologist at UC San Francisco. “They know when they add
sugar to food, you buy more. So they don’t want any limits. And they
have very effectively lobbied the USDA to not have any limits.”
Read the complete article HERE.
Posted by
Rebisa
at
11:07 AM
0
comments
Labels Health/Fitness, Interesting Facts, Legal Issues, MD Education News, National Education News
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
8:52 AM
0
comments
Labels MD Education News, Testing
The Board of Education’s next monthly meeting is Tuesday, Oct. 14, at the Jesse L. Starkey Administration Building on Radio Station Road in La Plata. The public portion of the meeting begins at 1 p.m. The meeting is televised live on Comcast Channel 96 and Verizon FiOS Channel 12, and is rebroadcast throughout the week. Board meetings are also streamed live on the school system website www.ccboe.com. Select CCPS TV and then choose the Live Broadcast tab.
Executive session – 12 p.m.
Call to order – 1 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance – Henry E. Lackey High School
Superintendent’s update to the Board
Reports of officers/boards/committees
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
9:33 AM
0
comments
Labels Meetings; Agendas; Notes
WTOP News
9/29/14
KIMBERLY HEFLING
AP Education Writer
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
5:47 AM
0
comments
Labels National Education News, Overcrowding Issues, Policies and Rules, Schedules-School/Transp.
Posted by
Jennifer Abell
at
5:42 AM
0
comments
MY PLEDGE TO YOU
"I will serve as an educational advocate on behalf of our community in order to advance the educational vision for our schools, pursue its goals, and encourage progress as we work together in a diverse society."