Tuesday, June 24, 2014

New Jersey school fined $10,000 for service dog ban


See article on WTOP
June 24, 2014
Education News

(AP) ) -- The Justice Department has reached a settlement with a New Jersey school district resolving allegations that a student was denied use of his service dog for school-related activities.
The agreement says the Delran Township School District must pay $10,000 to the student's family and adopt a service animal policy compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Federal authorities say the student uses the dog to alert to his seizures, provide mobility and body support, and mitigate symptoms of autism. He was prevented from bringing his dog on the school bus or to school activities.
The Justice Department says the student's mother spent months responding to burdensome requests for information and documentation to no avail. The agency says the district cooperated with the investigation.
A school spokesman wasn't available for comment.

Notes from Board of Education Work Session, 6/23/14

The Board of Education Work Session on Monday, June 23 will be re-broadcast on Comcast Channel 96, Verizon FIOS Channel 12 and is available via webstream at http://www.ccboe.com/ . To view the full agenda and the various reports, please visit BoardDocs.

The below notes are my personal notes and are not intended to be all-inclusive or official minutes for the Board of Education meetings and are provided as a request from my supporters and the general public in a personal effort to be more transparent. Although I have diligently tried to make these notes as unbiased and accurate as possible, I am only human and do make mistakes.

Executive session – 5:30 p.m.

Call to Order – 6 p.m. - Pledge of Allegiance

Public Forum

  • Colleen Longhi - APFO Committee status;  commissioners won't hear report, what now next steps.
  • Ms. Longi advised the BOE received an email late this afternoon from the county government inviting us to attend an APFO committee meeting on July 8.  Requesting additional information from the county if it is for a board to board meeting or just APFO committee meeting.
Work session - FY2015 operating budget - some reductions include....
  1. Private school students sharing buses with public schools
  2. Eliminate Summer Reading Academy
  3. Eliminate One-Time Salary Award
  4. Eliminate Athletic Trainers
  5. Elminate After-School Activity Buses
  6. Eliminate Prinicpal Request Portion of Teacher Substitues
  7. Eliminate Professional Library Materials (central office allocation)
  8. Eliminate 5 positions at St. Charles High Schools
  9. Reduce utilities and other maintenance contracts
  10. Restructuring of student transportation
  11. Eliminate 25 Building Service Worker positions, 31 FTE positions & Instructional Asst.
  • Abell requested clarification on technology reduction - not for required testing infrastructure; only for standard equipment replacement
  • Abell request clarification on teacher salary increases based on local officials public comments recently.
  1. 2011 - teachers did NOT receive a step increase
  2. 2012 - teachers received a step increase
  3. 2013 - teachers received a step increase
  4. 2014 - teachers will NOT receive a step increase
  5. teachers have NOT received a COLA since 2009.
  6. in summary, teachers are 2 steps behind where they should be at the end of this year and have NOT received a Cost of Living increase in 5 years. 
  • On another note of concern, the elementary school population saw an increase last year.  The trending prediction with local development is that we will continue to see an increase at the elementary school level which will increase class sizes and create a need for additional staff.  As the students age over the next several years, this trend will continue and the student population will once again see an increase that we had in years past that the county has unfortunately put us in a situation of unpreparedness.
Action items
Motion to accept Cook; Second Pedersen
Yes = Abell, Bowie, Cook, Lukas, Pedersen, Wise
Motion to accept Cook; Second Pedersen
Yes = Abell, Bowie, Cook, Lukas, Pedersen, Wise
  • Personnel
Motion to accept Cook; Second Lukas
Yes = Abell, Bowie, Cook, Lukas, Pedersen, Wise

New Business
Motion to accept FY2015 Tuition Rates by Pedersen; Second by Bowie
Yes = Abell, Bowie, Cook, Pedersen, Lukas; No = Wise
 Executive session

Saturday, June 21, 2014

Board of Education Budget Cut Considerations

Below is a link to the document of staff recommended budget cuts to the board of education budget.  These budget cuts will be necessary in order to balance our budget and open the new St. Charles High School in FY15 due to the lack of adequate and promised funding by the local board of commissioners.  The Board will have a work session on Monday, June 23rd at 6:00 p.m. to discuss this budget and take action.  This meeting is open to the public and will have a public forum.

Proposed REVISED FY15 Operating Budget

Friday, June 20, 2014

Board of Education Work Session Agenda, 6/23/14

The Board of Education of Charles County is holding a public work session at 6 p.m., Monday, June 23, in the Board room at the Jesse L. Starkey Administration Building on Radio Station Road in La Plata. The meeting is televised live on Comcast Channel 96 and Verizon FiOS Channel 12 and is rebroadcast throughout the week. Board meetings are also streamed live on the school system website at www.ccboe.com. Select CCPS TV and then choose the Live Broadcast tab. The following is a tentative meeting agenda and is subject to change.

Executive session – 5:30 p.m.

Call to Order – 6 p.m.

  • Pledge of Allegiance
Public Forum

Work session
Action items
 Executive session

Friday, June 13, 2014

The Budget vs The Budget

Much has been said about the Charles County Government Budget (or the lack thereof) over the past few days and people are very passionate on both sides of the spectrum.  Alot has been said on social media, he said, she said, blah, blah, blah.  I am making this post in regards to the Board of Education Budget; to provide a timeline with actual links to supporting documentation.  No more trying to figure out where the money is like a carnival shell game.  “Where’s the $$$???  See, here it is!”  Oh, no, it’s NOT! I hope this helps.

History of St. Charles High School  - I could go back to the design and plan stage but that's a former set of commissioners and another whole issue entirely.  Let's start with it was originally scheduled to open in FY13.  (I think that part is undisputed).  But, in March 2011 the current board of commissioners requested the current board of education delay the opening of the St. Charles High School until FY14.  The Board of Education, (mainly me, because I could see this train wreck coming years ago, please review my notes I posted all the way back in September 2009, yes 2009) wanted to get a promise in writing for the opening cost of $10M.  The state also wanted a commitment in writing from our local government on their commitment for funding before proceeding.  The commissioners obliged.  While I could not find the letter posted online to link, I found the minutes (although few), my notes from that meeting, and a recent letter from the state in my post Commissioners get hands slapped by state.   On a side note here, the $10M was baseline; having the new high school open with only three grades instead of four was ALREADY factored into that $10M. How it went to $7.7 was by request of the commissioners once again for us to squeeze and tighten and pinch some more because they could not meet their obligation.

Charles County Government Budget Here is Page 3 of the recently passed FY2015 controversial budget.  As you can clearly see, the difference from FY14 - FY15 is $2.9M.  NOT the $7.7M.  Certainly NOT the $10M. (for the Board of Education line item)

Let's start from the beginning and walk through this.  They say we have a FY14 Fund Balance "slush fund", " honey pot", "rainy day fund" of $18M they can direct us to spend as THEY see fit.

 
There is a huge problem with that:  most is COMMITTED MONEY and 50% of our budget comes from the state (so essentially, 1/2 isn't their's to start with) and the quoted amount is from June 2013. 


$18M June 2013 Total "Fund Balance"
(-$3.2M) FY14 General Fund Operating Costs
(-$2.1M) (March 2014 - OH PLEASE SEE NOTE 1 BELOW)
(-$5M) (See Note 2 below)
(-$2.4M) FY15 St. Charles HS (per CC Govt)
$5.3M "Fund Balance" (See Note 3 below)
*Note 1 - The County Commissioners requested assistance with their own FY14 budget shortage and we graciously  assisted with $2.1.  See document.

*Note 2 - This amount contains a required reserve for health insurance costs, and funds designated for major maintenance projects (F. B. Gwynn, lighting changes, school security, etc.); these are maintenance issues we have deferred addressing as long as we can, but MUST be addressed.  The money, for these necessary maintenance/ repairs is held in that “fund balance.”  There is also money set aside for emergencies (We have to maintain a lot of buildings, and those buildings MUST be “habitable” for use by staff and students.  Example:  No water?  No school!  We can defer some things – which we have done.  Other things MUST be addressed when they happen, and there MUST be money set aside for such!)
 
*Note 3 - We also have a commitment to OPEB (Other Personnel Employment Benefits) – that’s the retiree health insurance fund.  It’s an OBLIGATION we have not “funded” as yet…and THAT obligated money is in the “fund balance,” too. 

So you see, the $2.9M the county is “giving” us in the FY15 budget makes the funding pretty much a “wash.”  Take $2.1M, give $2.9M.   That’s the reality.

AND the county can again “take back” $ mid-year 2014-2015 (just as they did last year) because St. Charles funding is above the state-mandated amount for “Maintenance of Effort.” 

Even the $5M may seem like a lot of money to have in a "fund balance" to some people, but please consider, this is a $322M budget.  This does not leave huge room for error or emergencies for the coming year.  What happens at the end of FY15?  What about the schools that need renovations?
 
Additional Notes:
*The Developers’ Rights and Responsibilities Agreement is supposed to provide money from development to support the school system, but this Board of Commissioners has not allowed that money to be dedicated strictly for school funding.

See earlier post on how DRRA funds were used:  HERE.

See earlier post on APFO (Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance) and DRRA funding
 
*We have not been able to fund the earned step increases for our teachers, and this budget makes that impossible yet again.

Fiscal Year 2014
$322 million
Funding Sources
County -- 49.4%
State funds -- 48.8%
Federal funding -- .2%
Other --1.6%
Cost Per Pupil
$12,453

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Budget impact statement from Dr. Hill

Parents of students in Charles County Public Schools received the following message via phone and email yesterday. [Wednesday, June 11, 2014]:

"Hello, this is Kim Hill, Superintendent of Charles County Public Schools. I’d like to bring you up to date on important budget information that may impact your child’s education.

Last night, in a three to two vote, the Charles County Commissioners approved a budget that does not adequately fund the needs of our students or the opening of our new high school. The Commissioners promised to provide $10 million when we were ready to open the new high school. Instead, they voted to provide us with $2.9 million.

This lack of funding forces us to consider cuts to programs that may impact your child. It also means we will be able to hire fewer teachers, which means class sizes will increase.

Quality education requires adequate funding. By underfunding the school budget, the Commissioners will force the Board of Education to make spending cuts at a time when the costs of education are rising.

Adequate funding is the only way to keep Charles County Public Schools competitive. It’s my responsibility to advocate for the needs of our schools and your children, but I need your help. Please contact your County Commissioners and ask them to reconsider their budget decision.

Thank you for your support of Charles County Public Schools."

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Superintendent announces administrative changes, appointments

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Notes from Board of Education Meeting, 6/10/14

The Board of Education Meeting on Tuesday, June 10 will be re-broadcast on Comcast Channel 96, Verizon FIOS Channel 12 and is available via webstream at http://www.ccboe.com/ . To view the full agenda and the various reports, please visit BoardDocs.

The below notes are my personal notes and are not intended to be all-inclusive or official minutes for the Board of Education meetings and are provided as a request from my supporters and the general public in a personal effort to be more transparent. Although I have diligently tried to make these notes as unbiased and accurate as possible, I am only human and do make mistakes.

Executive session – 12 p.m.

Call to order – 1 p.m. - Pledge of Allegiance, La Plata High School JROTC

Col. Wade Video and Recognition - all

Motion by Wise to name the St. Charles High School pool after Col. Wade; Second by Cook
Yes = Abell, Bowie, Cook, Lukas, Pederse, Wise

Swearing-in of new Student Board member

Recognition Spring Athletic Accomplishments

Superintendent’s update - Report

Correspondence/Board Member updates
  • Pedersen - received a complaint from a member of the armed forces on lack of respect in audience during graduation 
  • Cook - attended adult independence graduation program
  • Wise - loved graduations, students behaved, audience did not
  • Bowie - Congratulations to Ms. Benson and Westlake Advocates; enjoyed attending graduations
Education Association of Charles County update - not present

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees update - not present

Student Board Member update - Report

Athletic eligibility - Policy Proposal
  • discussion revealed consensus of 2.0 GPA was too low and 2.25 was a good starting point with a increase to 2.5
CIP update - Report

Summer Reading Academy funding success - Report

FY 2014 Inter-category budget transfer request - Report
  • Abell - questioned the $18M fund balance; yes but committed
Board policies on non-discrimination - Policy Proposal on Gender Indentity
  • discussion on gaduations, athletic teams, locker rooms, bathrooms
Policy 5156.1 (new language) - Policy Proposal on Expulsions

Unfinished business - none

New business - None

Future agenda items
  • Abell - Board Goals, review and self-evaluation
  • Abell - New Board Member Orientation Book, Freshen
  • Abell - Replace EdLine with Parent Link

Recognition – 4:30 p.m.
  • Outstanding Vice Principal of the Year – Brenda Tillotson, General Smallwood Middle School
  • Outstanding Support Staff – Doris Hawkins, Milton M. Somers Middle School; Darlette Smith, Somers; Kristen Sackman, La Plata High School; Roy Kline, Radio Station Road Annex; Suzanne Alpert, Somers; and Richard Day, North Point High School
  • Resolutions: Maryland/Charles County Teacher of the Year, Kimberly King, mathematics teacher, Somers; Washington Post Agnes Meyer Outstanding Teacher Award, Carol Eaton, first-grade teacher, Gale-Bailey Elementary School
Public Forum – 6 p.m.
  • Alyssa Gerhart  - started petition to get bottled water offered in elementary schools
  • Simonet Marchei - Quality of daughters education since redistricted from Diggs to Berry.  Substitute unqualified to be in classroom.  complained to principal etc.  Told this substitute would not be in CCPS again.  Saw this same teach in the school again last year.  Poor leadership, verbal abuse.
Action items
  • Minutes
Motion to accept the Minutes by Cook; Second by Pedersen
Yes = Abell, Bowie, Cook, Lukas, Pedersen, Wise
  • Personnel
Motion to accept Personnel by Abell; Second by Lukas
Yes = Abell, Bowie, Cook, Lukas, Pedersen, Wise
  • Educational Facilities Master Plan
Motion to accept the Educational Facilities Master Plan by Abell; Second by Pedersen
Yes = Abell, Bowie, Cook, Lukas, Pedersen, Wise

Adjournment

Saturday, June 07, 2014

REMINDER: Board of Education Meeting, 6/10/14

The Board of Education’s next monthly meeting is Tuesday, June 10 at the Jesse L. Starkey Administration Building on Radio Station Road in La Plata. The public portion of the meeting begins at 1 p.m. and student and staff recognition starts at 4:30 p.m. The meeting is televised live on Comcast Channel 96 and Verizon FiOS Channel 12 and is rebroadcast throughout the week. Board meetings are also streamed live on the school system website at www.ccboe.com. Select CCPS TV and then choose the Live Broadcast tab. The following is a tentative meeting agenda and is subject to change.

Executive session – 12 p.m.

Call to order – 1 p.m. - Pledge of Allegiance, La Plata High School JROTC

Swearing-in of new Student Board member

Recognition – Westlake High School athletes

Superintendent’s update

Reports of officers/boards/committees

  • Correspondence/Board Member updates
  • Education Association of Charles County update
  • American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees update
  • Student Board Member update
  • Athletic eligibility
  • CIP update
  • Budget update
  • Summer Reading Academy funding success
  • FY 2014 Inter-category budget transfer request
  • Board policies on non-discrimination
  • Policy 5156.1 (new language)
Unfinished business

New business and future agenda items
  • New business
  • Future agenda items
Recognition – 4:30 p.m.
  • Outstanding Vice Principal of the Year – Brenda Tillotson, General Smallwood Middle School
  • Outstanding Support Staff – Doris Hawkins, Milton M. Somers Middle School; Darlette Smith, Somers; Kristen Sackman, La Plata High School; Roy Kline, Radio Station Road Annex; Suzanne Alpert, Somers; and Richard Day, North Point High School
  • Resolutions: Maryland/Charles County Teacher of the Year, Kimberly King, mathematics teacher, Somers; Washington Post Agnes Meyer Outstanding Teacher Award, Carol Eaton, first-grade teacher, Gale-Bailey Elementary School
Public Forum – 6 p.m.

Action items
  • Minutes
  • Personnel
  • Educational Facilities Master Plan
Adjournment

Fifth-grader begins crusade for bottled water at lunch

I saw this article in Friday's Indy and I must say...Kudo's to Alyssa!  I look forward to your presentation on Tuesday and I am behind you 100%.  If there is a way we can make this happen for next year, I would like to see it happen.  I TOTALLY disagree with a staff person's comment of we "can't".  There is no such word in MY vocabulary.

Girl wants option along with milk, juice

Sitting at lunch drinking a glass of water from the nearby water fountain, Alyssa Gerhart, a fifth-grader at William B. Wade Elementary School, got an idea to try to get bottled water listed as an option on the school lunch menu.

Alyssa, 11, is looking for a little support via a petition and writing to government officials to push her idea up the chain to make a change.

Alyssa started a petition at the Waldorf elementary school with support from school administration.

Currently, bottled water is not offered at the elementary school level.

Secondary schools in the system have bottled water a la cart for $1.25.

Alyssa said bottled water should be an option like milk and juice because, according to her online petition, “It is another choice for kids to enjoy with it being the healthiest drink there is.” Water is an option that does not have sugars like milk and juice that are currently on the menu, she said.

Alyssa is not looking to replace juice or milk, but only to add water as an option.

Read more here.

Friday, June 06, 2014

APFO Committee Report Additions - MUST READ

Remember way back over a month ao when the APFO Committee presented their "Final Report" to the commissioners. 

Remember some members of the committee decided to present their own reports or comments and NOT provide copies to the entire committee.

Remember the committee (me) requesting that we all receive a copy of the items being distributing.

Well it took a while, but this ole gal is like a dog with a bone....i don't give up.

Below is the three items. 

One thing i would like to point out that i found very interesting is that Commissioner Reuben Collins signed the APFO "Minority" Report.  I'm perplexed....

Enjoy reading!

NAACP Requests Statistics from Board of Education

Below is a list of statistics recently requested by the NAACP.  I felt the statistics could be useful to the public at large.  Please click on the link below to view.

  • Number of CCPS Employees by Race
  • Pass/Failure rate of students by race in each school
  • Number of suspensions for school year 2012-2013 and 2013-present by race
  • Number of in school suspensions by race and out of school suspensions by race
  • Number of expulsions for school year 2012-13 and 2013-present by race
  • Number of alternative school referrals by race
  • Number of African American students in gifted and talented programs

RESULTS

My Stance on Redistricting and Renovations

The below questions were presented to me on Facebook.
 
Why doesn't the school system engage in full redistricting/rebalancing to address the perceived overcrowding? How can the board stand behind a new pool at St Charles while at the same time say there's inadequate funding for repairs at other schools?
 
When the opportunity presents itself, the school system does engage in a full redistricting/rebalancing to address overcrowding. The most recent example is the comprehensive high school redistricting, conducted through an extensive, yearlong process. The high school redistricting takes effect in August with the opening of St. Charles High School. The opening of a new high school provided the opportunity to take a comprehensive look at all high school student populations and predicted growth and to change boundaries to better distribute students and relieve overcrowding for now, and hopefully for a number of years to come. Delays in construction of St. Charles High School stalled the comprehensive redistricting longer than the school system would have liked, but the Board did not want to redistrict high schools twice in a short time. This redistricting impacted students and staff at all six high schools and reduces the overcrowding while leaving room for growth at all seven, including the new high school. 
Overcrowding of our schools is not perceived; it is the main reason for redistricting. Any time we open a new school, redistricting is necessary to create an attendance zone and we do a comprehensive redistricting for the surrounding schools and areas to adjust for growth and overcrowding. When particular schools become severely overcrowded, we also redistrict. We try to minimize the impact when we redistrict, because the effect on people is great. 
Anyone who would suggest that we do a redistricting before it is absolutely necessary has never been redistricted, a parent of a student who has been redistricted or a staff member who has been transferred. A comprehensive redistricting today may only last a short time until there is a true planned growth plan.  We redistrict when we need to because that is our job as Board members. In Charles County, growth has made it more common than we would like.
Going forward, we are looking at ways to renovate our older buildings while adding capacity when we can. In August, the Board of Education will receive a comprehensive report on our facilities and develop a 10-year plan for renovations and additions.
 
As for your second question, the pool was approved by the county commissioners and will be funded from the excise tax. The county is fully funding this project. (In other words, the state will not, and would not, provide any funding for this project.) 
 
Building renovations are usually partially funded by the state and must be approved by the state.  However, each year the county is only allotted a certain amount of money from the state and in recent years we have had to use our allotments to build new schools.  So when it came time to request building renovations, the county has refused to fully forward fund them (in the past) for fear of never recouping the states portion of the project.
 

Thursday, June 05, 2014

CCPS changes AP testing and payment procedures

Charles County Public Schools (CCPS) is changing its Advanced Placement (AP) testing and payment procedures.

Assistant Superintendent of Instruction Amy Hollstein told the Board of Education on May 13 the changes are needed to promote both college and career readiness and to provide equitable resources for all students.

Starting next year, CCPS will eliminate all mock AP exams except U.S. Government, require AP students to take the class final exam and only reimburse payment for tests on which students receive a 3 or better. Currently, students pay for their first AP exam and the school system picks up the cost of any subsequent tests. Additionally, the school system will now pay for career certification tests, such as welding, Parapro or cosmetology exams, if a student passes and receives their certification.

Replacing the mock exams will be formative assessments, which teachers will administer in the first semester in order to address instructional needs. AP students will also take post-tests in February and take the final class exam. Currently, students who take the AP exam are exempt from the final; however, AP exam scores are available until late summer.

“Over the years we have done a good job of encouraging more students to take rigorous AP courses. Just being in an AP course has its benefits, and we will continue to encourage high participation and enrollment,” Hollstein said.

However, Hollstein said, “We want a student to take the test because they are motivated to take it.” Now, she said many students are only sitting for the exam to avoid the class final.

Charles County is one of the last counties in the state paying for most AP exams, Hollstein said. She added that the system would continue to pick up the exam cost for any student unable to pay the fee.

Monday, June 02, 2014

My Stance on School Renovations & Equity Among the Schools

 
This post stems from a question I received on my Facebook Page.

"Why is CCPS the only school district in the state that has not made renovations to existing schools to increase capacity and/or make improvements that would improve educational equity throughout the system in over a decade? And, as an elected BOE member have you supported the decisions that have lead to what MSDE describes as a serious problem?"

Over the past decade, the elected board has been working closely with the county commissioners to meet the growth needs of the county and together the two groups have moved forward on five new schools.  Throughout this time, there has been continual maintenance on our facilities and systemic projects to address specific components of the schools.  J.P. Ryon Elementary School was our last completed renovation project and Dr. Mudd Elementary School was fully designed and partially funded in 2001.  At this time the commissioners asked the board to choose between the renovation project at Mudd and the new elementary school, Diggs Elementary School.  After Diggs was funded, Dr. Mudd renovations fell off the radar and never returned to the CIP because of the large demand for new capacity and several years of 400-600 new students per year enrollment growth.  Both the Board of Education and the Commissioners realized that the state had limited funding and jointly pursued the construction of new schools to try and accomodate the growing population.  In addition, the board has worked through several redistricting sessions to address capacity and growth issues.  Now that growth has slowed, the perspective is shifting to using the limited state funds to address renovations.  The commissioners agreed to fund a facilities condition assessment, which is being completed by GWWO Architects and will be presented to both elected bodies in the near future.  As part of the facilities condition assessment, the consultant has considered all of the options for renovations and additions while developing the suggested ten year capital improvement program.
 
As for the statement, “MSDE describes as a serious problem” .  I am not familiar with this quote.  In addition i am unable to substantiate the claim that we are the only school system who does not have a renovation in process.